DMR vs. Manual Approach!
Problems faced with Manual Approach:
- Manual entry is time-consuming and prone to errors.
- Slow and inefficient invoice approval processes leads to delay in reconciliation.
- Duplication of invoices lead to multiple payment errors, waste of resources, complications in reconciliation process, and audit failures.
- Manual Routing of invoices can lead to delays and human errors and does not provide a clear visibility and limits accountability.
- Reconciliation delays – inconsistencies, human error, vendor disputes due to manual process can lead to reconciliation delays.
- Lost Invoices - When invoices are lost or difficult to locate, it can lead to significant operational delays.
- Discrepancies – A manual process can lead to discrepancies in financial records, making it challenging to reconcile financial statements and leading to potential audit issues.
Solution: DMR
- Data Accuracy: Improved accuracy through automated data extraction and validation.
- Invoice Mapping: Invoice are matched with POs along with supporting documentation to ensure verified payments.
- Invoices pass through various buckets, in a role-based approval system to ensure that credibility is maintained.
- Digital Transformation: Transition from paper-based to digital invoice processes.
- Duplicate Detection: Automatic detection and prevention of duplicate invoices.
- Digital Storage: Securely store all invoices electronically, eliminating the risk of loss.
- Highlighted supplier GST ratings will enable buyer to get a more comprehensive perspective on their ITC availment.
No Comments